Insert ALT tag here The University of Adelaide Australia
About the University
Campuses & Maps
Staff Directory
News & Events
Dentistry Home
Dental Education Research
Staff
Postgraduate Students
Publications
Grants
Research Projects
Funding Opportunities

text zoom: S | M | L

Further Enquiries:
North Terrace Campus
Level 4, Wills Building
THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
SA 5005
AUSTRALIA
Email

Telephone: +61 8 8303 5208
(Country and interstate callers toll free on 1800 061 459)
Facsimile: +61 8 8303 4401

 

You are here: Dental Education Research Group
Printer Friendly Version

Dental Education 

Introduction

Education research in the School of Dentistry has developed particularly since the implementation of a PBL curriculum for the Bachelor of Dental Surgery in 1993.  Student Approaches to Learning theory informs our education research.  Specifically, students' perceptions and understanding of the learning context influence the learning processes they adopt, which in turn influences their learning outcomes, ie, 'it is not the way we design our courses and programmes of study in higher education that relates to the quality of students learning, but how our students experience and understand that design' (Prosser, 2004, p51).  Therefore, various projects have focussed on students’ perceptions of their learning context and particularly the PBL components of the program. 


Preliminary studies and outcomes

The initial stages of these studies focussed on evaluation and utilised surveys of students to address the following questions related to the program and PBL packages:

Is the course enjoyable/relevant?
Is the workload heavy? Is there time to think/understand?
Are aims/objectives clear? Are criteria/standards clear?
Is there a choice in what is learnt? Are self-assessment and taking responsibility for learning supported?
Is there good teaching eg do staff understand student difficulties?
Are the PBL packages realistic, relevant, motivating? Do they support independent learning and integration of learning? (Supported by CUTSD grant, 2000-01)

It was clear from these surveys that: students enjoy the course; the workload increases with each year, but it is better than the conventional program; aims/objectives are clear; they are encouraged to take responsibility for their learning; staff are supportive; students indicate PBL packages are realistic, relevant and to some extent stimulate their learning; and generally PBL packages support independent learning and integrate with content with the rest of course (Wetherell et al., 1996; Townsend et al., 1997; Winning et al, 2004; Winning and Townsend, 2004). However, workload needs to be continually monitored and the clarity of assessment criteria/standards could be improved (Winning et al., 2005). 


Follow-up studies and outcomes

From these results, further program development and evaluation was identified, eg, review and development of materials and activities to assist with clarity of assessment criteria and standards as well as further research into students experiences of PBL.  For example,

Review and development of approaches to assist staff and students in using assessment criteria and standards particularly related to clinic: these projects have been supported by a University Teaching Development Grant (2003-04) and a nationally funded research grant (2006).

Studies in students’ experiences of PBL suggested students’ linking of PBL packages and processes to their clinic experience was limited. Therefore, in 2000, team members coordinated a project (supported by CUTSD, 2000-01) using student focus groups, which revealed students needed earlier, explicit opportunities to link PBL learning to clinic and more support to develop their group and independent learning skills.  As noted previously, in response to these findings C&L and DHS were redesigned and developed to better support student transitions to tertiary study.

A follow-up study (supported by ADRF & AUSRG-refer Grants) focussed on clarifying students’ perceptions of the purpose of the PBL packages, what learning strategies and methods they used, purpose and nature of assessment and the types of learning outcomes they achieved. These studies indicated that: students’ approaches to PBL packages were generally consistent with package design and appropriately developed for their year level/clinic experience; first-year students have responded positively to the modifications to semester one courses, emphasising the links between PBL and clinic (Skinner et al., 2006 in preparation); but further enhancement is needed for integration of learning outcomes, the clinical relevance of assessment, and group processes.


Current studies

In response to the findings from the above study, two further projects are underway, namely:

investigation of student experiences of groups is currently being undertaken as part of a PhD project by Ms V Skinner.  This project involved a cross-site study with students at Dublin Dental School and Hospital.

investigation of students’ understandings of PBL and its relationship to their learning outcomes. This project is a collaborative project with with Malmö University and Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, the University of Sydney.


References

Prosser M.  2004  A student learning perspective on teaching and learning, with implications for problem-based learning. European Journal of Dental Education 8:51-58.
Other references referred to above from the group are listed on the Publications page